Comments on: 4 Good Reasons to Play StarCraft II:Wings of Liberty

By: felix

felix — Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:46:47 +0000

how do i download the game

By: Rey Krill

Rey Krill — Mon, 18 Jul 2011 11:11:47 +0000

me and my friends still like Black Ops! The game retains its playability for quite a while. I have have a bunch of sweet kill cams you should check out! let me know what you think. Peace!

By: Ferdinand Orte

Ferdinand Orte — Fri, 08 Jul 2011 19:55:10 +0000

If you get caught then there can be various things that can happen.. . You could just get a take down notice from the owner. If the owner contacts your host about the issue, some hosts will impound your entire site until you resolve the issue. . . So yeah, not worth it usually. Pay for what you use. Stealing is not cool.

By: Brad

Brad — Sun, 29 Aug 2010 14:11:11 +0000

While we all know that the PC gaming industry has been the one with the best graphics, we also have known it has been the cheapest platform to play on as far as game price. The reason why xbox and PS3 games are 60 dollars is because they NEED permission from Microsoft and Sony to produce a game. This is not the case with a PC game. In my opinion the PC user has been screwed over because of the console. 60 dollars for a game is pretty ridiculous but yes I agree with you on if you play it who cares. Look at how much the Call of Duty series dropped the ball on MW2. I think as a PC gamer we will see many more games just consolized and we will be charged 60 bucks and that’s not fair at all. Anyways on to the article I think game developers need to make a game that people will not have to torrent because of the features it offers. Starcraft did a good job of integrating friends and a party chat just as Steam does for all it’s Valve games. The reason why we torrent is first of all a money issue. 50 bucks = higher sales. There will still be torrenting going on but I think a solid well made game should minimize that a lot just as Starcraft did. Thank you for your time and it’s early morning so if my thoughts didn’t come out as interpreted I apologize

By: pWitt

pWitt — Tue, 17 Aug 2010 04:47:07 +0000

I have to agree with M. Moore, I stumbled upon this post and the title does not match the post. Great intentions but you need some work on your persuasive writing skills. M. Moore gave you several good pointers. The game is awesome, I can tell you that while it’s not the longest campaign in the world, it is a well crafted continuation from it’s predecessor. The story flows well, and the new system for leveling up your arsenal in the single player campaign work really well together. I don’t want to give away too much so I will just say to M. Moore, I would give it a buy recommendation. Oh, and one last word for M. Moore, there is nothing like the adrenaline rush from the final mission! WOW what a challenge on the harder difficulty levels. Have fun with it!

By: Bnet

Bnet — Tue, 10 Aug 2010 05:49:42 +0000

I don’t agree with everything you say. But I completely agree with the 2nd point you made. People should stop whining about the game not being complete. Just because they chose to have 24 missions for Terran and 5 for protoss instead of 10 mission for each race doesn’t make the game incomplete.

And I know lots of people are not happy with the trilogy releases, but they come out in 1 and a half year. $60 is not a lot of you get to play the game for that long… And the expansion will probably slightly cheaper as well.

With regards to BattleNet 2.0, I’m just upset that there’s lots of things missing, such as Chat Channels, Clan Support, Group Replay Watching, Custom Names for games, LAN(although I understand why for this one).

By: Johnny B Bad

Johnny B Bad — Tue, 10 Aug 2010 01:56:43 +0000

Not really reasons to play.
More like
2 Reasons not to download it
&
2 Useless paragraphs

By: xodify.com

xodify.com — Wed, 04 Aug 2010 15:19:49 +0000

I think StarCraft II is a great game. Maybe a little bit too expensive.. But I totally agree with you on the other reasons. Good article.
Read more of what I think in my blog post:
http://www.xodify.com/2010/07/starcraft-ii-wings-of-liberty-first.html

By: The Dave

The Dave — Mon, 02 Aug 2010 10:12:32 +0000

This was… Terrible.

How about your “4 Good Reasons to Play Starcraft II” have something to do with gameplay?

You could’ve easily listed how amazing the campaign is, how it gets more and more interesting (both in story and in unit types, and so on) as you go along, how unique each and every mission is, from robbing trains to firing giant lasers.

I haven’t heard anyone complain about most of these things anyway.

Price? Starcraft II costs just as much as any new game. If anyone’s complaining about the price, then either they don’t buy new games so this wouldn’t be an issue, or they think Starcraft II isn’t a full game worthy of full price, which is incorrect.

I’m a little disappointed that StarcraftII.com would put this article on their homepage. As the previous commentor said, this, if anything, will remind people of the potential negative aspects of the game (not that you notice any once you play it).

By: Hyun Kim

Hyun Kim — Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:24:24 +0000

Thanks for your detailed comment on my blog, M. Moore.
I am not a professional blogger, but am just an avid gamer and a fan of StarCraft II. I do try to make the StarCraft II most interesting as possible while playing StarCraft II games.

I understand what you are trying to say in your comment, but I just wanted to talk about why some gamers disliked the StarCraft II and focus on why those arguments are weak, or not agreed by many other players. Rather than having few negative opinions, I wanted to share some positive aspects of the game while logically try to disagree their arguments.

Regarding StarCraft II Price: The price of the game is reasonable, considering Blizzard included many of new features (including the java script on various physics aspects. Ex: During the game, if a mechanic or air units are destroyed, the debris of the machines damage the nearby units, regardless of ally or enemy. That’s something realistic and unique feature. Plus, in StarCraft II, there was no single unit that can instantly walk top of a cliff. Now, SC2 has the Protoss Colosus unit that canperform this unique task because of the new development in SC2 javascript/programming capability.) It also have more graphical storyline in the game if you keep playing into the fifth or sixth campaigns.

Development Cost: I apologize about the information on the StarCraft II development cost. I have been reading other StarCraft II blogs and didn’t realize the WSJ was retracted for inaccurate information. I will take note of other information when I post the information. Thank you for pointing it out.

StarCraft II Game Play: It’s true that StarCraft II is trying develop an improved perspective of each race, but I think SC2 is focusing more on each race. Previous StarCraft I had three perspective altogether, and it took awhile to understand what is going on since you can play all three race together in different levels. So the storyline can be confusing unless you study it carefully. So, rather than have three perspective all in one game, if you can play one race at a time, then the gamer has more clear image and idea of each race’s perspective.

Again, thanks for your in-depth comments.
-H. Kim-